Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:40 am Post subject: [Asterisk-video] asterisk-video Digest, Vol 18, Issue 10
MESSAGE 1:
Hi Emmanuel,
Regarding your request...
Quote:
On the other hand, if we need to proceed with videocaps back port, would
someone be interested in testing video interoperability with us? We have
here some various videophone, hard, soft, Wifi, etc. We could also
provide the row source tree of our patched version.
We would be pleased to help.
We have got here also a variety of videophones like GXV 3000, Bria, Eyebeam,
etc.
We also have lab machines able to be accessed remotely to do this sort of
things.
Hi Klaus!
We met at OPENSER Meeting earlier this year in Paris.
Could you eventually help me compile mpeg4IP? The release I have been trying
to use seems to be corrupted.
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:18:23 +0200
From: Emmanuel BUU <emmanuel.buu@ives.fr>
Subject: [Asterisk-video] videocaps - the return
To: Development discussion of video media support in Asterisk
<asterisk-video@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <470D419F.1000801@ives.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello everybody,
We have been working a lot on video codec negociation on Astersik 1.4.x
(http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9815). The patch that corrects the
various cases has become so huge that I have no hope it will be ever
approved as a fix in the 1.4 branch. Except for some identified cases
(183 Call progess with video playback), we reached a point where we need
to back port videocaps into 1.4 branch to make any progress on video
interoperability between sip phones. Before proceeding, we would like to
ask again an update on videocaps or equivalent on the trunk.
Is there any news on that matter? What are the plans?
On the other hand, if we need to proceed with videocaps back port, would
someone be interested in testing video interoperability with us? We have
here some various videophone, hard, soft, Wifi, etc. We could also
provide the row source tree of our patched version.
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Reza Fatahillah <ezhot_95@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-video] app_h324m crash
To: Development discussion of video media support in Asterisk
<asterisk-video@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <85303.52469.qm@web50403.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I've finally commited the patch to solve Reza's
> crashes.
>
> Testing is welcome.. :)
>
> BR
> Sergio
Hi Sergio,
Thanks for the patch.
I have tried the callout several times. Still no
crash.
I think it's ok now.
But, another problem is sometime the callout
disconnected, with this message:
Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard
(0) Spare: 0 Location: Transit network (3)
Ext: 1 Cause: Temporary failure (41), class =
Network Congestion (resource unavailable) (2) ]
This happened also from previous version. The first
call succeeded, then second call failed.
Regards,
Reza
______________________________________________________________________________
______
Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:14:45 +0200
From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-video] app_h324m crash
To: Development discussion of video media support in Asterisk
<asterisk-video@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <470DBF55.3000308@pernau.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Reza Fatahillah schrieb:
>
> But, another problem is sometime the callout
> disconnected, with this message:
> Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard
> (0) Spare: 0 Location: Transit network (3)
> Ext: 1 Cause: Temporary failure (41), class =
> Network Congestion (resource unavailable) (2) ]
>
> This happened also from previous version. The first
> call succeeded, then second call failed.
Does this happen during call setup or during the call? I often see call
setup problems which I guess are located somewhere in the mobile network.
regards
klaus
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Reza Fatahillah <ezhot_95@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-video] app_h324m crash
To: Development discussion of video media support in Asterisk
<asterisk-video@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID: <108764.40292.qm@web50409.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
This happened during call setup, after outgoing call
preceeding. Then went to Disconnect Indication state.
Reza
--- Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>
wrote:
> Reza Fatahillah schrieb:
>>
>> But, another problem is sometime the callout
>> disconnected, with this message:
>> Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU)
> standard
>> (0) Spare: 0 Location: Transit network (3)
>> Ext: 1 Cause: Temporary failure (41), class =
>> Network Congestion (resource unavailable) (2) ]
>>
>> This happened also from previous version. The
> first
>> call succeeded, then second call failed.
>
> Does this happen during call setup or during the
> call? I often see call
> setup problems which I guess are located somewhere
> in the mobile network.
>
> regards
> klaus
______________________________________________________________________________
______
Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings,
and more!
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:34:44 +0200
From: "Rene van Weert" <rvweert@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-video] Pach for q931 in misdn
To: "Development discussion of video media support in Asterisk"
<asterisk-video@lists.digium.com>
Message-ID:
<7e04f3c60710110434o134b0670s950dbbbad7583536@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi, I am using mISDN too. Has anybody succeeded already in making this
patch?
Cheers,
Ren?
2007/9/14, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>:
>
> Sergio Garcia Murillo wrote:
>> Hi klaus,
>>
>> I've recieved a mail from Philippe asking me if it could be possible to
>> use h324m_call with misdn.
>> As you had to do a modification to the q931 negotiation for chan_zap, do
>> you think it could be
>> possible to make the same patch for misnd?
>
>
> I have no clue about misdn but I guess it should be easy to add. It is
> only a certain transfer capability and a certain user information layer
> 1 value.
>
> Thus, by looking at my patch it should be easy to port it to misdn.
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-video mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-video
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-video/attachments/20071011/fdaed3ab
/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: [Asterisk-video] asterisk-video Digest, Vol 18, Issue 10
Walter Rodrigues Filho wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
MESSAGE 1:
Hi Emmanuel,
Regarding your request...
Quote:
On the other hand, if we need to proceed with videocaps back port, would
someone be interested in testing video interoperability with us? We have
here some various videophone, hard, soft, Wifi, etc. We could also
provide the row source tree of our patched version.
We would be pleased to help.
We have got here also a variety of videophones like GXV 3000, Bria, Eyebeam,
etc.
We also have lab machines able to be accessed remotely to do this sort of
things.
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum