Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:30 pm Post subject: [Asterisk-video] [svn-commits] rizzo: branch rizzo/video_v2
Hi Matteo,
Do you have a quick list of features for this branch ?
Does this branch sit on the trunk ?
Did you work out to somewhat merge the work done by videocaps branch ?
Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hi,
Il Tuesday 23 October 2007 16:55:13 SVN commits to the Digium repositories ha
scritto:
Quote:
At this point we have reasonably robust behaviour with
all supported codecs:
h261, h263, h263p, h264, mpeg4
so people interested in video are encouraged to try this out.
just done, a first quick test with a LeadTek LR8885 video phone
(that supports h263 and h264) shows up no video :(
Remote with is not seen locally and local
video is not decoded by the phone.
tested with both h263 and h264.
The 8885 is the new version of Lr8882, which supports
only h263. the *5 supports also h264.
Tomorrow I'll test with the grandstream video, which
is only h264 and report...
if there's some way to debug why the video is not seen,
just tell me, I'll check it out.
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 8:13 pm Post subject: [Asterisk-video] [svn-commits] rizzo: branch rizzo/video_v2
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:21:56PM +0200, Emmanuel BUU wrote:
Quote:
Hi Matteo,
probably i can answer this :)
Quote:
Do you have a quick list of features for this branch ?
Does this branch sit on the trunk ?
Did you work out to somewhat merge the work done by videocaps branch ?
this branch is just trunk, with a modified chan_oss.c and chan_alsa.c
(the latter not tested recently) to send and receive video using
ffmpeg codecs (h261, h263, h263p, h264, mpeg4 at the moment) and
video4linux1 and X11 capture as the video source.
The rest of the files is unchanged, except for some small modifications
to the Makefiles to properly link the libraries involved (sdl, avcodec, X11),
and a minuscule set of modifications to chan_sip, to
produce proper SDP messages for the video codecs.
I have looked at the videocaps branch but the set of changes there is
huge and i couldn't figure out what is relevant to our changes
and what is not.
One thing we have not implemented (yet i am not sure if/how it is
in videocaps) is some signalling extension to inform the channel driver
of the codecs supported by the other party, so that each source can
produce a suitable video format.
cheers
luigi
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum