NO, that cost ya $500/channel blame the ITU :)
----- Original Message -----
From: AR Tarzi
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions
Are there digium licenses for G711 ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Underwood
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 15:47
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions
Rich Adamson wrote:
>We've got about five licenses and a remote 7960's v6.3 running over
>dsl working just fine. The average user cannot tell the difference
>between 711 and 729. Installation was easy and straight forward,
>although you'll find comments in the archives that 729 installation
>requires a non-scsi drive on the * box.
>
>
Your average users must be rather different from global average users,
then. They must also be close to deaf :-)
The MOS for G.729 are not bad for an 8Kbps codec, but hardly compares to
G.711
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>NO, that cost ya $500/channel blame the ITU
:)</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=artarzi@batelco.com.bh href="mailto:artarzi@batelco.com.bh">AR
Tarzi</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 05, 2004 12:08
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 -
licenses and opinions</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#0000ff size=4>Are there digium
licenses for G711 ?</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=steveu@coppice.org href="mailto:steveu@coppice.org">Steve
Underwood</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 05, 2004
15:47</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 -
licenses and opinions</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Rich Adamson wrote:<BR><BR>>We've got about five licenses
and a remote 7960's v6.3 running over<BR>>dsl working just fine. The
average user cannot tell the difference<BR>>between 711 and 729.
Installation was easy and straight forward, <BR>>although you'll find
comments in the archives that 729 installation<BR>>requires a non-scsi
drive on the * box.<BR>> <BR>><BR>Your average users must be
rather different from global average users, <BR>then. They must also be
close to deaf :-)<BR><BR>The MOS for G.729 are not bad for an 8Kbps codec,
but hardly compares to
<BR>G.711<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Steve<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] g.729 - licenses and opinions
Rich Adamson wrote:
Quote:
We've got about five licenses and a remote 7960's v6.3 running over
dsl working just fine. The average user cannot tell the difference
between 711 and 729. Installation was easy and straight forward,
although you'll find comments in the archives that 729 installation
requires a non-scsi drive on the * box.
Your average users must be rather different from global average users,
then. They must also be close to deaf :-)
The MOS for G.729 are not bad for an 8Kbps codec, but hardly compares to
G.711
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>NO, that cost ya $500/channel blame the ITU =
:)</span></font></p>
</div>
<blockquote style=3D'border:none;border-left:solid black =
1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;
margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'=
<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3D3
face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt'>Rich Adamson =
wrote:<br>
<br>
>We've got about five licenses and a remote 7960's v6.3 running =
over<br>
>dsl working just fine. The average user cannot tell the =
difference<br>
>between 711 and 729. Installation was easy and straight forward, =
<br>
>although you'll find comments in the archives that 729 =
installation<br>
>requires a non-scsi drive on the * box.<br>
> <br>
><br>
Your average users must be rather different from global average users, =
<br>
then. They must also be close to deaf :-)<br>
<br>
The MOS for G.729 are not bad for an 8Kbps codec, but hardly compares to =
<br>
G.711<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Steve</span></font></p>
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum