Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:37 am Post subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Quote:
> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
> fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not
> send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ##
> does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones
(Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I
just tested by calling my bank's IVR.
applied patch. went great. now single # does not transfer and
double does. but, i am having the same problem as matthew, the
# does not go through at dmtf. all other keys go through as
dmtf, just not the #. this is on a spa3k.
clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
randy
---
ps. and i have a general wonder/question about this. is someone
who uses a commercial pbx, say a meridian or whatever, unable to
use ivr systems because # is not sent?
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:46 am Post subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
99% of the companies I call that say hit # after entering your
response, doesnt actually require the #.. I've only encountered a few
places that if you don't hit the # it ignores your response,
eventually sending you to an operator or hangs up on you.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 09:37:09 -0700, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
Quote:
>> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
>> fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not
>> send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ##
>> does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
> I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones
> (Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I
> just tested by calling my bank's IVR.
applied patch. went great. now single # does not transfer and
double does. but, i am having the same problem as matthew, the
# does not go through at dmtf. all other keys go through as
dmtf, just not the #. this is on a spa3k.
clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
randy
---
ps. and i have a general wonder/question about this. is someone
who uses a commercial pbx, say a meridian or whatever, unable to
use ivr systems because # is not sent?
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 11:51 am Post subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I don't know but it's IMHO, this should be just the opposite. Single # for
a transfer and double ## to send the key on as DTMF. How many objects in a
dialplan start with a #?
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
To: "Barton Hodges" <barton@gcmcomputers.com>
Cc: "splatters" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Quote:
>> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
>> fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not
>> send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ##
>> does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
> I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones
> (Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I
> just tested by calling my bank's IVR.
applied patch. went great. now single # does not transfer and
double does. but, i am having the same problem as matthew, the
# does not go through at dmtf. all other keys go through as
dmtf, just not the #. this is on a spa3k.
clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
randy
---
ps. and i have a general wonder/question about this. is someone
who uses a commercial pbx, say a meridian or whatever, unable to
use ivr systems because # is not sent?
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:05 pm Post subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
What if you call an external system and get a voicemail. "Press # to finish
your message" . you would have to press ##.
IMHO I think most users are not sophisticated enough to transfer calls. If
they are they can press ##.
Or am I missing something? :)
S.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Lyle Giese
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I don't know but it's IMHO, this should be just the opposite. Single # for
a transfer and double ## to send the key on as DTMF. How many objects in a
dialplan start with a #?
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
To: "Barton Hodges" <barton@gcmcomputers.com>
Cc: "splatters" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Quote:
>> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
>> fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not
>> send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ##
>> does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
> I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones
> (Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I
> just tested by calling my bank's IVR.
applied patch. went great. now single # does not transfer and
double does. but, i am having the same problem as matthew, the
# does not go through at dmtf. all other keys go through as
dmtf, just not the #. this is on a spa3k.
clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
randy
---
ps. and i have a general wonder/question about this. is someone
who uses a commercial pbx, say a meridian or whatever, unable to
use ivr systems because # is not sent?
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:10 pm Post subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I do some script type programing and have seen this in other uses. IMHO, it
would be easier to program this way. Single # go to transfer function. Get
# as first character in transfer, send out the DTMF tones instead and drop
the request to transfer.
I could be all wet on this, but my feeble mind sezs this makes sense from a
programming perspective.
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Storm D. J. Petersen" <stormp@telus.net>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 3:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Quote:
What if you call an external system and get a voicemail. "Press # to
finish
Quote:
your message" . you would have to press ##.
IMHO I think most users are not sophisticated enough to transfer calls.
If
Quote:
they are they can press ##.
Or am I missing something? :)
S.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Lyle Giese
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I don't know but it's IMHO, this should be just the opposite. Single #
for
Quote:
a transfer and double ## to send the key on as DTMF. How many objects in
a
Quote:
dialplan start with a #?
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
To: "Barton Hodges" <barton@gcmcomputers.com>
Cc: "splatters" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
> >> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
> >> fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not
> >> send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ##
> >> does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
> > I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones
> > (Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I
> > just tested by calling my bank's IVR.
>
> applied patch. went great. now single # does not transfer and
> double does. but, i am having the same problem as matthew, the
> # does not go through at dmtf. all other keys go through as
> dmtf, just not the #. this is on a spa3k.
>
> clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
> is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
>
> randy
>
> ---
>
> ps. and i have a general wonder/question about this. is someone
> who uses a commercial pbx, say a meridian or whatever, unable to
> use ivr systems because # is not sent?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:15 pm Post subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Personally I think like you... but I have to force myself to consider the
dim wits that use my PBX. :) They are fat old men who barely understand
what a telephone is... let alone VOIP. :)
S.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Lyle Giese
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 1:11 PM
To: stormp@telus.net; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I do some script type programing and have seen this in other uses. IMHO, it
would be easier to program this way. Single # go to transfer function. Get
# as first character in transfer, send out the DTMF tones instead and drop
the request to transfer.
I could be all wet on this, but my feeble mind sezs this makes sense from a
programming perspective.
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Storm D. J. Petersen" <stormp@telus.net>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 3:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Quote:
What if you call an external system and get a voicemail. "Press # to
finish
Quote:
your message" . you would have to press ##.
IMHO I think most users are not sophisticated enough to transfer calls.
If
Quote:
they are they can press ##.
Or am I missing something? :)
S.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Lyle Giese
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
I don't know but it's IMHO, this should be just the opposite. Single #
for
Quote:
a transfer and double ## to send the key on as DTMF. How many objects in
a
Quote:
dialplan start with a #?
Lyle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
To: "Barton Hodges" <barton@gcmcomputers.com>
Cc: "splatters" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: doublehash patch for 1.0.1
> >> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
> >> fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not
> >> send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ##
> >> does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)
> > I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones
> > (Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I
> > just tested by calling my bank's IVR.
>
> applied patch. went great. now single # does not transfer and
> double does. but, i am having the same problem as matthew, the
> # does not go through at dmtf. all other keys go through as
> dmtf, just not the #. this is on a spa3k.
>
> clearly * is receiving the #, as ## does do a transfer. so why
> is a single # not being sent onward as dtmf?
>
> randy
>
> ---
>
> ps. and i have a general wonder/question about this. is someone
> who uses a commercial pbx, say a meridian or whatever, unable to
> use ivr systems because # is not sent?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum