Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 5:43 pm Post subject: [asterisk-users] safe_asterisk, respawning etc. (was: Re: /e
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
Quote:
How useful are the equivalent safe_asterisk scripts?
To be honest I still haven't decided if asterisk should be auto-
respawned by something like safe_asterisk or inittab[1] or launchd[2]
or upstart[3] or Service Management Facility[4] or whatever the
various launchers are called or if it should be treated as any other
daemon: i.e. assume they don't crash.
There's no real reason to treat asterisk differently but then again
I haven't seen Apache or MySQL crash very often but I did see some
versions of Asterisk crash more often than it was acceptable.
(Seems to be better now.)
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:23 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] safe_asterisk, respawning etc. (was: Re: /e
On Sunday 31 May 2009 13:36:26 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
Quote:
Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> How useful are the equivalent safe_asterisk scripts?
There's no real reason to treat asterisk differently but then again
I haven't seen Apache or MySQL crash very often but I did see some
versions of Asterisk crash more often than it was acceptable.
(Seems to be better now.)
Interesting, since safe_asterisk is modeled directly after safe_mysqld.
--
Tilghman
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:02 am Post subject: [asterisk-users] safe_asterisk, respawning etc. (was: Re: /e
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:18:46PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Quote:
On Sunday 31 May 2009 13:36:26 Philipp Kempgen wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen schrieb:
> > How useful are the equivalent safe_asterisk scripts?
>
> There's no real reason to treat asterisk differently but then again
> I haven't seen Apache or MySQL crash very often but I did see some
> versions of Asterisk crash more often than it was acceptable.
> (Seems to be better now.)
Interesting, since safe_asterisk is modeled directly after safe_mysqld.
Modeled after, maybe. In practice safe_asterisk doesn't work well.
It's just too easy for the underlying Asterisk to get in a respawn loop.
It's just too easy for two safe_asterisk-s to run along-side and have
undesired effects.
If you want something to watch over Asterisk: that's what runit and such
are for. For me safe_asterisk adds a whole new level of complicates
without much gain.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
